About This Blog
Automating Invention is Robert Plotkin's blog on the impact of computer-automated inventing on the future of invention and patent law.
News Feeds
RSS
Receive E-mail Updates through Bot-A-Blog
Categories
Links
Blogs
- 271 Patent Blog
- BLOG@IP::JUR
- Boalt IP Blawg
- Epistasis Blog
- Evolutionary Computation
- Genetic Argonaut
- IlliGAL Blog
- Invent Blog
- IP Watchdog
- The Long Tail
- IP Newsflash
- The Open Road
- Patent Pending
- Patently-O
- Peer to Patent
- The Singularity Institute
- Promote the Progress Blawg
Technology & Policy
- Berkman Center for Internet and Society
- Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- MIT STS Program
- Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic
- Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society
- U.S. Public Policy Committee of the Association for Computing Machinery
Resources (Law)
- Bitlaw
- European Patent Office
- Software Patent Institute
- Software Patents vs. Parliamentary Democracy
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- World Intellectual Property Organization
Resources (Technology)
- Genetic-Programming.org (John Koza)
- Introduction to Genetic Algorithms
- Genetic Algorithms Archive
- Genetic Algorithms and Artificial Life Resources
- Genetic Programming FAQ
- Genetic Programming Bibliography
- Generative Programming
- HDL Page
- NASA Evolvable Systems Group
- Evolvable Hardware (Los Alamos National Laboratory)
- Evolvable Hardware (University of Oslo)
Commercial Applications
- Affinnova, Inc.
- Icosystem Corporation
- Imagination Engines, Inc.
- Matrix Advanced Solutions Ltd.
- Natural Selection, Inc.
- NuTech Solutions
- Quantum Leap Innovations
- Red Cedar Technology
- TenFold Corporation
People
- Sion Balass
- Peter J. Bentley
- Hans-Georg Beyer
- Eric Bonabeau
- Ralph Clifford
- David Davis
- David Fogel
- James Foster
- David Goldberg
- Erik Goodman
- J. Storrs Hall
- Andrew Hodges’ Alan Turing Site
- John Holland
- Gregory Hornby
- Lorenz Huelsbergen
- John Koza
- Ray Kurzweil
- Hod Lipson
- Jason Lohn
- Julian Miller
- James Moor
- Daniel H. Pink
- Jordan Pollack
- Joe Rothermich
- Karl Sims
- Daniel H. Pink
- Lee Spector
- Stephen Thaler
- Adrian Thompson
- Marcel Thuerk
- Christof Teuscher
- Andy Tyrell
- Tina Yu
Philosophy
Search
Recent Entries
- Biological Models for Robot Design
- Using Genetic Programming to Repair Software
- Encouraging Innovation with Cash Prizes
- Bio-Computing Focus at 2009 Supercomputing Conference
- A Theory of Evolution for Technology
- Bilski, Business Methods, Software Patents, and the Supreme Court
- The Need for Regulating Autonomous Machines
- Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli Discusses Future Isssues in EDA
- First Standard Graphical Language for Biology
- AI-Controlled Super Mario Brothers
- Using Genetic Algorithms to Blend a Diesel-Gasoline Cocktail
- Programmable DNA Computers
Archives
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- February 2008
- June 2006
- May 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
« Software Patent Application Filings on the Rise in India | Main | U.S. Patent Office Takes Steps to Improve Software Patent Quality »
January 4, 2006
Quantum Computing Comes One Step Closer
ACD points out that the IQOQI (Institute of Quantum Optics and Quantum Information) in Austria has produced the first "quantum byte," consisting of 8 Calcium ions. This development brings the "quantum computer" closer to becoming a reality.
According to the current Wikipedia entry for "quantum computer," "It is widely believed that if large-scale quantum computers can be built, they will be able to solve certain problems faster than any classical computer." The implications for artificial invention are clear. Most of the software that is being used for artificial inventing relies on powerful computers and, perhaps more importantly, provides better results when run on even more powerful computers. As a result, people in the field are always seeking more powerful computers at lower cost. Why design better software when you can improve your results just by running the same software on a more powerful computer?
John Koza began using a 1,000-Pentium computer back in 1999 to run genetic algorithms for (among other things) inventing new hardware and software (see photo). Although today's computers can provide the same performance for about 1/10th of the price of Koza's 1999 system, he was able to achieve impressive results using the technology that was available at the time. Fully quantum computers, if they were to become possible, could take this forward by (pun fully intended) a quantum leap.
Posted by Robert at January 4, 2006 6:57 PM
category:
Artificial Invention
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)