About This Blog
Automating Invention is Robert Plotkin's blog on the impact of computer-automated inventing on the law (primarily patent law). The blog also explores the implications of computer-automated inventing for creativity, ethics, and high-tech industry.
Categories
Links
Blogs
- 271 Patent Blog
- BLOG@IP::JUR
- Boalt IP Blawg
- Epistasis Blog
- Evolutionary Computation
- Genetic Argonaut
- IlliGAL Blog
- Invent Blog
- The Long Tail
- IP Newsflash
- The Open Road
- Patent Pending
- Peer to Patent
- The Singularity Institute
- Promote the Progress Blawg
Technology & Policy
- Berkman Center for Internet and Society
- Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- MIT STS Program
- Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic
- Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society
- U.S. Public Policy Committee of the Association for Computing Machinery
Resources (Law)
- Bitlaw
- European Patent Office
- Software Patent Institute
- Software Patents vs. Parliamentary Democracy
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
- World Intellectual Property Organization
Resources (Technology)
- Genetic-Programming.org (John Koza)
- Introduction to Genetic Algorithms
- Genetic Algorithms Archive
- Genetic Algorithms and Artificial Life Resources
- Genetic Programming FAQ
- Genetic Programming Bibliography
- Generative Programming
- HDL Page
- NASA Evolvable Systems Group
- Evolvable Hardware (Los Alamos National Laboratory)
- Evolvable Hardware (University of Oslo)
Commercial Applications
- Affinnova, Inc.
- Icosystem Corporation
- Imagination Engines, Inc.
- Matrix Advanced Solutions Ltd.
- Natural Selection, Inc.
- NuTech Solutions
- Quantum Leap Innovations
- Red Cedar Technology
- TenFold Corporation
People
- Sion Balass
- Peter J. Bentley
- Hans-Georg Beyer
- Eric Bonabeau
- Ralph Clifford
- David Davis
- David Fogel
- James Foster
- David Goldberg
- Erik Goodman
- J. Storrs Hall
- Andrew Hodges’ Alan Turing Site
- John Holland
- Gregory Hornby
- Lorenz Huelsbergen
- John Koza
- Ray Kurzweil
- Hod Lipson
- Jason Lohn
- Julian Miller
- James Moor
- Daniel H. Pink
- Jordan Pollack
- Joe Rothermich
- Karl Sims
- Daniel H. Pink
- Lee Spector
- Stephen Thaler
- Adrian Thompson
- Marcel Thuerk
- Christof Teuscher
- Andy Tyrell
- Tina Yu
Philosophy
Search
Recent Entries
- Patents vs. Prizes
- Your Genome for $399
- Outsourcing Manufacturing Isn't Just for Large Companies Anymore
- My Book on Invention Automation to be Published by Stanford in Spring 2009
- Gamers Solve Problems in Science and Computing
- Software Improvises Musical Accompaniments
- Computer Simulation Uncovers Evidence of Biological Evolution
- Has Microsoft Really Patented Page Up and Page Down?
- Breaking the Software Development Speed Limit with Agile Programming
- Complexity: Computers Come to the Rescue
- Calculator Dates Back Two Millenia
- Does Google Make Us Dumber or Smarter?
Archives
« History of Evolutionary Computation | Main | The Latest in Automatic Programming »
December 29, 2005
Competing with People and Computers
In a ComputerWorld piece entitled, "What Tech Skills are Hot for 2006?," Thomas Hoffman says that the threat to U.S. IT workers from outsourcing is not as great as most people think. He quotes Craig Symons of Forrester Research Inc. as saying that "most of the stuff that's going offshore is low-level coding jobs." This leaves a demand for business analysts and IT relationship managers in the U.S., among others. In particular demand are people with experience in a specific industry.
This effect of outsourcing tech work to human workers in other countries is the same as the effect of automating tech work using machines. Once your skills can be performed more quickly, less expensively, or more quickly by someone else--whether the "someone" is a human or a machine--your only chance at success is to compete on the basis of higher-level (or otherwise specialized) skills that have not yet become automated or outsourceable less expensively. This is just as true for businesses as it is for individuals.
One might try to maintain job security in such an environment in several ways. Lawyers do it in part by creating legal barriers to entering the field (e.g., rules prohibiting the unauthorized practice of law) and corresponding economic barriers (e.g., the high cost of obtaining a license to practice law). But the guild approach is rapidly breaking down for reasons I won't go into here.
One might try to predict which skills will elude automation and outsourcing for a long time and then sell products and services utilizing those skills. But predicting the future is a tricky business. Just ask a travel agent, encyclopedia publisher, or anyone in the music industry how successfully they predicted the impact of computer technology on their businesses over even the last five years.
Another strategy, which can of course be combined with the first two, is to develop the ability to adapt rapidly to changing conditions. It is important to keep in mind, however, that in this context the changing conditions include not only the spread of technological skill to people worldwide, but also the development and spread of technology that itself can perform tasks previously only capable of being performed by humans. If you are a technologist developing a technology that has the potential to displace you, you should at least consider keeping it to yourself. Then you can use it to boost not only your productivity but perhaps your job security as well.
Posted by Robert at December 29, 2005 10:51 AM
category:
Work
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

